- Wednesday, April 02, 2025
By: Vibhuti Pathak
The Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has strongly rejected a report by The New York Times, which claimed that a British aerospace manufacturer, H.R. Smith Group, supplied military equipment to an Indian company, Hindustan Aeronautics, which was then allegedly passed on to Russian arms agency Rosoboronexport.
The report, published on Friday (28), alleged that the UK-based firm shipped the equipment to India, where it was later transferred to Russia. However, Indian officials have dismissed these claims as “factually incorrect and misleading.”
Reacting to the report, MEA sources stated, “We have seen the report published by The New York Times. The claims made in it are misleading and distort facts to suit a specific political narrative.”
The ministry further clarified that the Indian entity mentioned in the report has strictly adhered to all international obligations concerning strategic trade controls and end-user commitments.
MEA officials emphasized that India has a robust legal framework to regulate strategic trade and expects reputed media outlets to conduct thorough due diligence before making such allegations.
“India’s regulatory system ensures compliance with all international commitments. It is disappointing that such reports are published without proper verification,” sources added.
The NYT report also drew attention to the alleged political links of the H.R. Smith Group, stating that the company donated £100,000 (approximately $130,000) to the UK’s Reform Party, just two days after Nigel Farage took over as leader.
This report has sparked discussions in British-Asian circles, particularly among Indians in the UK, who have been closely following Indo-British trade relations amid ongoing geopolitical tensions.
With the UK and India strengthening their defense and trade partnerships, such reports raise concerns about potential misinformation influencing public opinion. British Indians, who have a strong presence in business and politics, are increasingly questioning the motivations behind such narratives.
As diplomatic ties continue to evolve, Indian and British authorities are expected to address concerns regarding defense trade regulations to prevent misinformation from affecting bilateral relations.
