- Sunday, March 09, 2025
By: Shubham Ghosh
The Supreme Court of India on Thursday (13) pronounced a split verdict on the burning hijab-ban issue in the southern state of Karnataka.
A bench comprising justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia pronounced the judgment and while the former dismissed the petitions against the hijab ban, the latter allowed them.
One of the lawyers representing the petitioner said the matter will now be placed before the chief justice of India (CJI) and he will decide whether a new bench will hear the matter or the matter is referred to a larger bench.
Justice Gupta dismissed appeals challenging the Karnataka high court’s order which had upheld the state government’s order to ban wearing hijabs in educational institutions of the state.
“There is a divergence of opinion. In my order, I have framed 11 questions. First is whether the appeal should be referred to the Constitution Bench,” he said.
Justice Dhulia, on the other hand, allowed the appeals and set aside the high court’s order. “It’s a matter of choice, nothing more nothing less,” he said while pronouncing the order.
The apex court had earlier reserved its order on various petitions challenging the high court upholding the ban on hijab in educational institutes.
The arguments in the matter went on for 10 days in which 21 lawyers from the petitioners’ side and solicitor general Tushar Mehta; additional solicitor general KM Nataraj; and Karnataka advocate general Prabhuling Navadgi argued for the respondents.
The court was hearing various pleas against the high court’s judgment upholding the Karnataka government’s decision to direct educational institutes to prescribe uniforms in educational institutes.
Addressing the court, senior advocate Dushyant Dave, in his rejoinder submission had said that the Karnataka government’s circular which enforced the dress code has no reference to the Popular Front of India (PFI), the radical group which has recently been banned by the Indian government.
Various petitioners have approached the apex court challenging the high court’s upholding the state government’s order which directs strict enforcement of schools and colleges’ uniform rules.
One of the appeals in the top court has alleged “step-motherly behaviour of government authorities which has prevented students from practising their faith and resulted in an unwanted law and order situation”.
The appeal said the high court in its impugned order “had vehemently failed to apply its mind and was unable to understand the gravity of the situation as well as the core aspect of the Essential Religious Practices enshrined under Article 25 of the Constitution of India”.
A bench of the high court comprising chief justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, justice Krishna S Dixit, and justice JM Khazi had earlier held that the prescription of uniform is a reasonable restriction that students could not object to and dismissed various petitions challenging a ban on hijab in education institutions saying they are without merit.
The hijab row erupted in January this year when the Government PU College in Udupi, Karnataka, allegedly barred six girls wearing the hijab from entering.
Following this, the girls sat in protest outside the college over being denied entry.
Soon after, boys of several colleges in Udupi started attending classes wearing saffron scarves. This protest spread to other parts of the state as well leading to protests and agitations in several places in the southern state which is ruled by the Hindu right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party.
The Karnataka government thereafter said that all students must adhere to the uniform and banned both hijab and saffron scarves till an expert committee decided on the issue.
On February 5, the pre-university education board released a circular stating that the students could only wear the uniform approved by the school administration and no other religious attire would be allowed in colleges.
[With agency inputs]
